In the grand pattern of things you get a B+ for hard work. Where you actually lost us ended up being on your specifics. You know, as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And it could not be much more true in this article. Having said that, let me tell you exactly what did give good results. The article (parts of it) is certainly pretty convincing and that is possibly the reason why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, although I can easily see the leaps in reason you come up with, I am not necessarily convinced of how you seem to unite the points which produce your final result. For right now I will, no doubt subscribe to your point however hope in the foreseeable future you actually link the facts much better.